Reword availability quiz for clarity. Fixes #162 #164
Conversation
Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
|
@mkdolan - is this better? |
|
@SecurityCRob - any thoughts on this reword? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
line 394 - remove "commercial". EVERYONE cares about availability, enterprise or not. Also, change the listed attackers to "threat actors" or "malicious actors". Not everything is organized crime or nation-state. "Script kiddies" are some of the likeliest threats to availability.
line 402 - don't change to "guarantee". That implies something like a contract. Ensure is the better word
|
@SecurityCRob - great points, thank you. I'll remove "commercial" and changed "guarantee" to ensure". Regarding the listed attackers - you're right, that's too specific. Let's make it even simpler, let's just eliminate that part of the text. All that matters is being the "target of a highly-resourced distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS)" - it really doesn't matter what their motivations are. I'll post the update. If no other comments come in, we can just merge. |
Clarify availability question. Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
No description provided.